![]() ![]() These findings are discussed in relation to gender differences in value expression. These results were qualified by significant interactions between driving situation, gender and vertical individualism and between gender and horizontal collectivism. However, the main effects suggested that horizontal collectivism and vertical individualism predicted posit offences for men only, depending on situation for vertical individualism. Probabilities of offending were also higher for men than women and were positively predicted by vertical individualism. Statistical analyses showed that, compared to a control situation, probabilities of offending were lower in the heavy traffic condition and even lower in the high probability of being caught condition. #Eric marciano radar crack driversIn an online survey experiment, drivers had to evaluate their probabilities of committing several driving offences in three driving situations, manipulating traffic density level and the probability of being caught by the authorities. In addition, we aim to explore the role of situational factors and gender differences, as potential moderators for the effects of individualist and collectivist values on offending behaviours. Within this framework, we propose to test these relationships in a sample of French drivers (N = 666). Recent studies have found that cultural values, transposed at individual level through the vertical-horizontal individualism-collectivism model, may be relevant for understanding offending behaviours in drivers and pedestrians. Concerning the predictors of speeding intentions and motivations to reduce speed, self-efficacy ratings for reducing one’s speed proved to be the best PMT predictor.ĭriving offences can be a cause of road crashes and their psychosocial determinants have been studied using different approaches. Men calculated a cost-benefit balance to avoid slowing down when they knew the enforcement location. ![]() An unknown speed-enforcement location was one way of decreasing both women’s and men’s speed. Furthermore, automatic radars were perceived as easier to cope with in a maladaptive way (i.e., self-efficacy for avoiding a sanction and adapting speed as a function of speed-enforcement location). Threat-certainty ratings were higher when automatic radars were announced, but speeding intentions did not vary according to the automatic versus human type of speed enforcement. As expected, the intention to speed was lower when speed-enforcement warning messages were announced than in the control situation. Participants (245 students, 51% men) had to choose their speed behavior in a mental simulation of a driving episode on a freeway. Coping factors (e.g., self-efficacy, response cost) from protection motivation theory (PMT Rogers, 1983) were also considered as critical variables of compliance. police officers) and knowledge of enforcement location (known vs. Stemming from deterrence theory (Gibbs, 1985 Homel, 1988) the factors of “celerity”, “certainty”, and “severity” of the sanction were explored as a function of type of speed enforcement (automatic radars vs. ![]() ![]() The present study investigated how young drivers assess speed-enforcement warning messages and how these messages affect their motivation to reduce speed. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |